Dr. Maria E. Erling
Lutheran Theological Seminary at Gettysburg

 Religion In America
LTSG Home Page

Erling Pages Index

The Rev. Dr. Maria Erling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 All information, quotes and graphics are taken from www.headcoverings.com.

 

 

 



 










   Artifact Analysis

By Jan Trammell-Savin                                                                              
Artifact Analysis for 2.402 Religion in America
November 28, 2000                                                                                        

She Maketh Herself Coverings

An Exploration of the Website:

www.headcoverings.com

"She Maketh Herself Coverings is a home based ministry-business. It is run by the four daughters of our family (ages ranging from 19 to 30) as a cottage industry. Our purpose is to make Jesus Christ known and to provide a support and inspiration to Christian women and their daughters. We pray that you will be blessed and encouraged as well.

"In 1983, the Lord directed the ladies in our family (all five of us!) to wear the head veiling in obedience to an ordinance in I Corinthians 11. We spent many years searching for an appropriate style veiling. We have worn bandannas and scarves in the past but found them uncomfortable for consistent, daily wear. We wanted a headveiling style that was attractive as well as comfortable and brought glory to the Lord rather than queries about denominations.

The Jones Family, 1990's

"After receiving many ideas from friends and family members, we designed a style that was practical, comfortable and beautiful. Thus satisfied, we settled down to live our quiet lives . . . until the summer of 1994. While attending a home education conference, our family was approached concerning our convictions about I Corinthians 11. Most ladies were wanting a source for the newly designed veiling we were wearing -- both ready made and patterns.

"So our ministry was launched under the name, 'She Maketh Herself Coverings . . .' taken from the phrase in Proverbs 31:22a, since the word "coverings" is the Hebrew word 'marbedym,' meaning coverlets, shawls, or kerchiefs made for women. Since then, we have found other veiling styles and accessories that have been useful. Our humble brochure blossomed into a catalog with more than twenty pages of ready-made veilings, patterns, hair accessories, and lists of resources and literature. . . . When we were encouraged to begin this ministry in the summer of 1994, we had no idea the blessing it would be to us as well as to many dear sisters who were seeking the Lord's leading. What an encouragement it has been to watch God's ladies strive to be the virtuous women that He wants us to be and to submit to the ordinance in 1 Corinthians 11!  We have appreciated the encouragement and input that have been received during the past five years of the 'pressing onward' that is characteristic of the lives of God's people."[1]

 
The product offered consists of some 43 different styles of bonnets and kerchiefsfor both adults and children. The styles appear to approximate most any headcoverings for women found in the various cultures in the world. Some are completely plain; others have lace and trim, often described with the words "very feminine." A full range of colors is available, including patterns and textures such as eyelet, gingham and denim. Some of the styles cover one's entire head, others only the top and back. Paper patterns are also available for those who would like to sew their own coverings.

            Various fabrics are available depending on the style chosen, including cotton, batiste, chintz, French and Japanese lace, polyester, and tulle. Some of the designs can be made from more than one type of fabric at the customer's request. Tips on fabric care are included with the link to the color charts.

             The Testimonies page of the website offers links to close to thirty testimonies contributed by women who have chosen to wear headcoverings for religious reasons. A few themes repeat themselves among the testimonies of different women. The overall reason for choosing to wear a headcovering appears to be the belief that one must obey the specific commands of the New Testament canon in order to be in right relationship with God as a Christian.[2] Namely, in I Corinthians 11, Paul exhorts the women in his audience to pray and prophesy only with covered heads. (See Resources below for a more in-depth discussion of the exegesis.)

            The women who have chosen to follow this advice literally, believe that:

1)      The headcovering is a sign of obedience to God's command. Not only do the women believe that they are obeying God simply by wearing the covering, but some also refer to it as a reminder of other obedient behavior. They are to submit to the authority of their husbands, and also to behave with kindness and humility. The covering acts as a kind of string-on-the-finger as it were, helping them to remember the broader injunctions of love. A cancer survivor who has chosen to wear the covering states, "Rebellion was the reason the Lord had allowed my sickness in the first place."

2)  The headcovering is necessary to show submission both to God and to human males as per their reading of the command. In one testimony, it is pointed out that women should be submissive unless their husbands are perceived to be disobeying God's commands. In that case, remembering that God is sovereign over the husbands as well, the women are advised to follow their understanding of God's commands.[3] This applies specifically to those husbands who may not want their wives wearing a covering.

3)      The headcovering gives them an opportunity to witness to the grace of God in their lives as obedient Believers. More than one woman has been asked, "What is that thing on your head?" when in public places. The women appreciate these opportunities to share their stories, both to bring "glory to God" and to try to persuade others of the truth of their position.

4)      Scripture is the ultimate authority for daily living in material as well as spiritual ways,  and all decisions should be made with Scripture as a conversation partner, not with our "imperfect brains." Scripture offers a plain understanding for daily life, according to one testimony: "It never seemed right that a knowledge of ancient Greco-Roman social history should be prerequisite to a proper interpretation of Scripture, particularly where a culturally-based interpretation appeared to set aside the plain teaching of the passage." Husbands and wives study Scripture to determine God's commands for their contemporary situations. This is not the only indicator of truth, however. One testifier states, "Over the following weeks I was amazed at how many people, especially men, quietly told me that they thought the passage was relevant for today."

Other specific behaviors seem to be held in common among the women who choose to wear the headcovering. For instance, homeschooling, women teaching only other women and children, comments regarding the recognition of "God's hand" in one's life, the use of Hebrew words in place of English words (i.e., "Ruach Hakadosh" for Holy Spirit), a belief in God's sovereignty over child-bearing (and therefore a refusal to use contraception) and modesty in dress (including the wearing of dresses only) occur in several testimonies.

      Far from a sense of oppression, the women speak of deriving a sense of peace and purpose from their obedience and submission. They experience a strong sense of love from gatherings where women are wearing headcoverings. They compare their willingness to cover as a love for God similar to the love for their husbands which delights to do those things that their husbands appreciate. They experienced greater grace in their lives (no specific examples are given) once they began wearing coverings. The covered daughters of covered women are described as mature and well behaved beyond the appearances of their peers who are of "the world." They live less complicated, stressful lives by submitting to the authority of their husbands and male pastors and teachers.  They feel a sense of place and strength in their ministry in the home, and in some cases, even power. A woman's power is seen to be manifest in her rightful place as administrator of homelife.

            According to Paul, there is a specific benefit to wearing the covering: angelic protection. Not only do the women claim this protection for themselves, but also the effect is believed to apply to one's entire household when the women are obedient to the command to cover their heads. This is an additional source of power for their lives. The women who refer to this angelic theology, quote from the same source: Demons in the Church, by H. Skolfield.

The testimonies are full of references to works by men exegeting I Corinthians 11 and commenting more broadly on its themes, as in the above-mentioned work. Most of the resources named on this page of the website are available for sale, many of them in cassette form. One of the testimonies includes an exegesis by the testifier's husband; another is available in its complete form on-line through a link to Apostolic Press.  This latter exegesis, by "Brother Doug Savin"[4] of Toronto, Canada, is put forward in the belief that Scripture can be understood without any doubt as to the conclusions of the interpreter. "Let us analyze that chapter [I Corinthians 11] in context of the whole Scripture to eradicate any doubt as to what it really means." [Emphasis mine.]

            Brother Savin identifies two problems that have contributed to the controversy over headcovering: "the way the King James Version translates the Apostle Paul's letter [from] the Greek language in which it was originally written" and "that some take this chapter to be directed only to the Corinthian church." Brother Savin continues by pointing out his understanding of the passage as a direction not only to others outside of Corinth, but also to those in other eras of history.

Another difficulty that Brother Savin addresses is the applicability of the passage to married women and men only, versus its universal application. Based on his reading of the Greek, he concludes that the passage is meant for women and men in general, all meant for women and men in general, all women being submissive to all men, not only wives to husbands.

            Angelology is given an extended treatment, with references to other passages to help determine why Paul brought up the subject of angels in this particular context. The submission of women to men is an opportunity for witness to the angels who can only know about God's marvel of salvation through watching the Church.

            In his "last statement" about headcovering, Brother Savin calls it "self-evident" according to Paul, who refers his audience to the observable practice of Jewish women who worshipped God with covered heads. "Gentile converts should have realized that this was proper simply by observing the Jewish converts who continued to wear the veil during worship." He also discounts the possibility of Paul counting a woman's hair as her covering, reasoning that Paul has changed his topic to hair length. "[Paul] would not systematically expound universal truths about God and, using them as a base, lay down the proper decorum for public worship and then say, 'I was just teasing you; the woman's hair is really her headcovering.' "[5]

            He concludes by quoting Paul's final point, that the churches at that time know no other practice, i.e., you should go along with it, too. Relying on his earlier finding that the passage is a universal one and not a time-bound or geographically-specific one, Brother Savin invokes this statement to apply to contemporary church life. Paul has, in effect, pronounced a final blessing on the practice because it falls in line with what is common in the culture.[6] Brother Savin further supports his conclusions by citing pictorial evidence from art in the Roman catacombs, a drawing from the 10th century C.E., and a painting of Rembrandt, as well as a statement from Clement of Alexandria in the 2nd century C.E.

The visitor to this website may be struck by the combination of traditional and technological cultural elements in the presentation, as I was. On the one hand, the entire purpose for the website is to promote a mode of dress originated thousands of years ago in a culture completely different from the culture of the website psychologically, socially, geographically, and to a certain extent, even theologically. Not only dress, but also other behaviors are encouraged: female submission to male authority, attention to details of fabric use, adherence to certain assumptions about biology (i.e., contraception), and assumptions of sexual attraction (certain hairstyles and clothes as a "turn on").

On the other hand, the usage of a website to make this belief known is a participation in what is perhaps the most progressive aspect of "the world" today. The technology of the Internet provides great opportunities not only for the spread of a message, but also for the effective commercial promotion of one's product line. However, it also is an open door to the same types of "worldly" sexuality and female assertiveness from which the groups promoting headcovering are retreating.

One of the testimonies points out that headcovering is a neglected practice – one that was commonly accepted in the culture up until about 100 years ago. Interestingly, it is elements of this time period, basically the Victorian era, which the graphics in the website seek to emulate. The images hearken back to the stereotypical "good old days" when women dressed more modestly and were not even allowed to vote, much less hold ordained office in mainline churches.  The Victorian era was a time of idealized and idolized femininity – a kind of 19th century chivalry that appreciated women as pure and modest, in need of rescue and protection and contributors to society through aesthetics and gracefulness and not through intellectual discovery or political assertiveness. In this context, the headcovering protects women from untoward advances, and protects men from sexual temptation.

The Victorian era was the setting for Charles Sheldon's classic, In His Steps, which popularized the phrase, "What would Jesus do?" One of the testimonies makes reference to this mindset when its writer confesses unkind behavior while not wearing a covering. She realized her mistake and said, "Jesus would NEVER have said what I said." In this context, the headcovering is a protection from sin.

The social changes over the past century have indeed shaken up our certainty about the world and our places in it. Theologically, biblical criticism as a discipline seems to be rejected by this group of testifying women who make such statements as, "It just means what it says," and "How do we decide what parts to throw out, and what parts to keep?" [Referring to Scripture passages].  The Jones family chose a quote from Martin Luther to drive home this point:

            If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition every portion of the Word of God; except precisely that little point which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Him. Where the battle rages there the loyalty of the soldier is proved; and to be steady on all the battle front besides, is mere flight and disgrace if he flinches at that point.[7]

In this context, the headcovering is a protection from being out of relationship with God. By fulfilling the commands, the women have a sense of peace and love in their relationships with God.[8]

To the extent that it involves a woman's suppression of herself in the world, it is seen as God's will. As one testimony put it, "But just as the resurrected life outshines the execution-stake ('cross'), so living the resurrected life transcends the daily self-death." The quote brings to mind images of the joyful early church martyrs. In this context, the headcovering is a protection against God's abhorrence of pride, vanity and disobedience.

            In sum, the women who have chosen to wear headcoverings are invested in their relationships with God and their communities to the best of their abilities to live God's desires for them as they understand them. This website provides a helpful material and spiritual meeting ground for these women.

 

End notes

[1] All information, quotes and graphics are taken from www.headcoverings.com.

[2] In one case, the writer is also concerned about obeying Old Testament specifics as well, as in the case of the mixing of clothing materials.

[3] One woman says the following, apparently without any recognition of the irony in her statement: "It is so important to please YHWH and not man . . . . My husband blessed my wearing the veil at church services, then at church gatherings, and then, later, around the house."

[4] Not to be confused with the current writer's husband!

[5] Actually, Paul has been known to use extensive sarcasm in his letters, for instance in II Corinthians 10-13.

[6] Another irony comes from a statement from one testimony, "Where in Scripture does it matter what the culture around us does?"

[7] The origin of the citation is not noted.

[8] In yet another irony, Martin Luther is quoted in a context that seems to imply salvation by works. It is only through strict obedience to all that God is perceived to have commanded that one can be sure of one's relationship with God. Martin Luther's intense struggle with just this issue compelled him to live by "grace alone" believing in God's compassionate relationship with humanity despite humanity's inability to fulfill specific commands.

 

 


LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY AT GETTYSBURG

A Seminary of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
(ELCA)
©1996-2005 Lutheran Theological Seminary at Gettysburg
E-mail comments and questions to
info@ltsg.edu 
This site was updated on 05/28/03